Home | Contact | Join | Search 

 Membership  |  Conservation  |  Media  |  Support  |  Publications  |  Branches  |  Enjoying Nature  |  Children  |  About Us


Media Releases

2008 Index

2007 Index

2006 Index

2005 Index

2004 Index

2003 Index

2002 Index

2001 Index

2000 Index

1999 Index

1998 Index

1997 Index

 

 

United urged to learn difference between gorse and kahikatea

10 June 2004 - Wellington

Contact: Kevin Hackwell, Conservation Manager, 04 385 7374, 021 227 8420

"Most school children in this country would be able to tell the difference between a kahikatea tree and a gorse bush, even if United MP Gordon Copeland cannot," Forest and Bird's Conservation Manager Kevin Hackwell said today.

Mr Copeland today repeated claims made in Parliament last year describing the location of the proposed Dobson hydro dam as being 'a few scrawny stands of gorse'.

"The proposed 500 ha hydro lake would inundate three valleys covering 250 ha within the Card Creek Ecological Area on the West Coast as well as reducing the Arnold River's flow to one third of current levels," Mr Hackwell said.

"The Card Creek ecological area is one of the few remaining areas in the Grey ecological district with valley floor podocarp forest. It includes rimu, and an unusually high proportion of kahikatea and matai. Much other valley floor forest in the district has been cleared for farming, forestry and other development and little kahikatea forest remains anywhere in New Zealand," he said.

Advocates for the Dobson hydro dam are again understating its impacts and will need to weaken the Conservation Act if they want the proposal to proceed.

"We are particularly worried that National, which protected the area in the 1980s, is now advocating its destruction. Nick Smith is making a mockery of the decision of his former colleague Jonathon Elworthy," he said.

"National, Act and United need to make it clear to New Zealanders whether they are proposing to weaken the Conservation Act in a way that would open the door for open cast coal-mining and other destructive activities in New Zealand's most valuable conservation lands, because that is the only way this hydro dam will proceed," he said.

"New Zealand is one of the world's worst wasters of energy. It is small minded to call for the destruction of an ecological area when so much more could be done to make energy available for homes through less wastage, and money saving conservation measures such as insulation and solar water heating," he said

"The proposed dam would affect the enjoyment of canoeists and kayakers as well as river's ability to support healthy fish and invertebrate populations. Habitat for two threatened native fish species, the giant and short jawed kokopu would be destroyed by the flooding and the scheme would create barriers for species such as long finned eels and kokopu which need to migrate to sea to breed," he said

Ends
Contact Geoff Keey, Forest and Bird 04 385 7374 or g.keey@forestandbird.org.nz for images.

 



 


Comments regarding this website can be sent to Forest & Bird Webmaster
© Copyright 2008 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc.