Media Releases

2008 Index

2007 Index

2006 Index

2005 Index

2004 Index

2003 Index

2002 Index

2001 Index

2000 Index

1999 Index

1998 Index

1997 Index

| |
United urged to learn difference between gorse and kahikatea
10 June 2004 - Wellington
Contact: Kevin Hackwell, Conservation Manager, 04 385
7374, 021 227 8420
"Most school children in this country would be able
to tell the difference between a kahikatea tree and a gorse bush, even if United
MP Gordon Copeland cannot," Forest and Bird's Conservation Manager Kevin
Hackwell said today.
Mr Copeland today repeated claims made in Parliament last year describing the
location of the proposed Dobson hydro dam as being 'a few scrawny stands of
gorse'.
"The proposed 500 ha hydro lake would inundate three valleys covering 250
ha within the Card Creek Ecological Area on the West Coast as well as reducing
the Arnold River's flow to one third of current levels," Mr Hackwell said.
"The Card Creek ecological area is one of the few remaining areas in the
Grey ecological district with valley floor podocarp forest. It includes rimu,
and an unusually high proportion of kahikatea and matai. Much other valley floor
forest in the district has been cleared for farming, forestry and other development
and little kahikatea forest remains anywhere in New Zealand," he said.
Advocates for the Dobson hydro dam are again understating its impacts and will
need to weaken the Conservation Act if they want the proposal to proceed.
"We are particularly worried that National, which protected the area in
the 1980s, is now advocating its destruction. Nick Smith is making a mockery
of the decision of his former colleague Jonathon Elworthy," he said.
"National, Act and United need to make it clear to New Zealanders whether
they are proposing to weaken the Conservation Act in a way that would open the
door for open cast coal-mining and other destructive activities in New Zealand's
most valuable conservation lands, because that is the only way this hydro dam
will proceed," he said.
"New Zealand is one of the world's worst wasters of energy. It is small
minded to call for the destruction of an ecological area when so much more could
be done to make energy available for homes through less wastage, and money saving
conservation measures such as insulation and solar water heating," he said
"The proposed dam would affect the enjoyment of canoeists and kayakers
as well as river's ability to support healthy fish and invertebrate populations.
Habitat for two threatened native fish species, the giant and short jawed kokopu
would be destroyed by the flooding and the scheme would create barriers for
species such as long finned eels and kokopu which need to migrate to sea to
breed," he said
Ends
Contact Geoff Keey, Forest and Bird 04 385 7374 or g.keey@forestandbird.org.nz
for images.
|  | |

|