Media Releases

2008 Index

2007 Index

2006 Index

2005 Index

2004 Index

2003 Index

2002 Index

2001 Index

2000 Index

1999 Index

1998 Index

1997 Index

| |
Cuts to snapper, oreo and rig quota needed
21 July 2004 - Wellington
Contact: Barry Weeber, Senior Researcher, 04 385 7374,
021 627 329
Kevin Hackwell, Conservation Manager, 04 385 7374, 021 227 8420
Despite clear evidence of over-fishing, the Ministry of
Fisheries (MFish) is refusing to review fishing quotas for snapper, oreos and
rig (lemon fish).
Forest and Bird has written to the Minister of Fisheries David Benson-Pope
and asked him to reduce the catch limits for snapper in the West Coast of the
North Island (including Auckland's West Coast), rig in Nelson and the West Coast,
and oreos in Southland.
"Forest and Bird is disappointed but not surprised at MFish's failure
to propose reductions in these stocks," said Forest and Bird's Senior Researcher
Barry Weeber.
"Forest and Bird has been involved in making submissions on proposals
for changes in catch limits and regulations for nearly 15 years. During that
time we have been consistently disappointed at the slow response by MFish to
fish stocks that are in decline," he said.
"MFish has again failed to take its environmental responsibilities seriously,"
he said.
SNAPPER
"Snapper is a very important recreational fishery which is under pressure
from over fishing. The stocks on the West Coast of the North Island (SNA8) are
well below the level that would support the maximum sustainable yield,"
he said
"The new snapper 8 assessment indicates that the stock is between 6-14%
of the unfished biomass, but it should be at more than 20% of the original biomass,"
he said.
"The snapper fishery is expected to take between 14 and 30 years to recover
to legal minimum biomass at current levels of fishing. Yet John Luxton, who
was the Minister of Fisheries in 1998 planned to have snapper recover by 2008.
Even then, snapper will only be one fifth of its original biomass, so it's no
wonder recreational fishers have complained," Barry Weeber said.
"From the information available it is our assessment that the catch limit
for the snapper SNA8 fishery should be cut by at least 20 percent," he
said.
RIG
"Rig, like any other shark species, has very low productivity and can
be easily over fished, especially where a fishery targets pregnant females.
The Nelson and the West Coast (SPO7) rig fishery is well over fished,"
he said.
"We are staggered that MFish is not proposing to cut the catch limit for
rig in the SPO7 fishery. From the information available it is our assessment
that the catch limit should be cut by at least 50 percent. The catch limits
well exceed the amount of rig that fishers can find," he said.
"The rig catch rate in Tasman Bay/Golden Bay (area 038) has declined by
70 percent between 1989/90 and 2002/03. Commercial fishers can no longer even
catch their allowable limit," he said.
"MFish has failed to act on its own rules that require a reconsideration
of the management of rig in the SPO7 fishery following low catch rates in 2001/02
and 2002/03," he said.
OREOS
"Oreos are a long lived, slow growing, deep water species with biological
characteristics and deep water habitat requirements similar to orange roughy.
Oreos are vulnerable to over fishing. The current oreo catch in the Southland
fishery is unsustainable," he said.
"MFish's own stock assessment report for oreos in Southland concluded that
catches 'are probably not sustainable'. From the information available it is
our assessment that the catch limit for the oreo OEO1 fishery should be cut
by at least 50 percent," he said.
OTHER STOCKS ALSO NEED ATTENTION
"These are not the only stocks in trouble. Other stocks that also need
to be reconsidered are orange roughy north of Bay of Plenty and Raglan and paua
in Southland/Otago and Marlborough Sounds. We will again be writing to the Minister
of Fisheries as we make our own assessments of the scale of cuts that are needed,"
he said.
NOTES
Section 13 of the Fisheries Act 1996 states that the legal minimum catch target
will be at or above the biomass that supports the maximum sustainable yield.
Key extract from letter to Minister :
In conclusion we ask you to urgently review the decision of the Ministry of
Fisheries not to propose to review the catch limits for rig (SPO7), west coast
snapper (SNA8) and oreo (OREO1) and that you add these stocks to this year's
stock assessment round and make the appropriate reductions in their catch limits
to ensure their sustainability.
On 29 September 1998 then Fisheries Minister John Luxton stated "I have
decided that it is appropriate to retain the existing [Total Allowable Catch]
at 1500 tonnes and to set a 10 year rebuild timeframe for SNA8." He went
on to state "it is important to consider not only an improvement in non-commercial
access and satisfaction in the fishery within a short timeframe but also the
benefits to all sectors that will be derived from achieving the biomass level
that will produce [Maximum Sustainable Yield] for this stock."
A new stock assessment was carried out for smooth oreos in the Southland fishery,
the oldest and most consistent oreo fishery in OEO1. The Stock Assessment Plenary
Report concluded for the smooth oreos in Southland that: "the mature [unfished]
biomass was probably small, less than 21 000t., and that the stock was unlikely
to able to support a large fishery. Prior to this assessment catch limits were
ad hoc, not documented, and not based on estimates of biomass or yield."
It also concluded that: catches at the level of the 2000-01 annual catch (1010t.)
are probably not sustainable
|  | |

|