Media Releases

2008 Index

2007 Index

2006 Index

2005 Index

2004 Index

2003 Index

2002 Index

2001 Index

2000 Index

1999 Index

1998 Index

1997 Index

| |
Supreme Court decision victory for public participation19
April 2005 - Wellington Contact: Kevin Hackwell,
Conservation Manager, 04 801 2215 (w), 04 389 4815 (h), 021 227 8420
The
Supreme Court today released a decision on public notification under the Resource
Management Act that reinforces the need for Environment Court appeal rights.
The
Supreme Court has held, in a unanimous decision, that a resource consent allowing
the operation of a discount outlet shopping centre by Discount Brands Ltd in Akoranga
Drive, Northcote is invalid because Discount Brands' application for the consent
was not publicly notified.
"This case is a symptom of a wider problem.
Central Government and local authorities are bending over backwards to accommodate
business-led opposition to the Resource Management Act. As a result the law is
being abused," said Conservation Manager Kevin Hackwell.
"This
decision shows why Environment Court appeal rights on public notification are
needed. Currently people can only go to the High Court, and then the Supreme Court
to ensure that their rights are upheld. This is very expensive," he said.
"This
case was between trade competitors. They are the only ones who can afford the
legal costs involved," he said.
"A low-cost appeal right on notification
would soon sort out those councils that deny people their legitimate, lawful right
to have their say on developments that will affect them and their environment,"
he said.
NOTES
Development proposals are only lawfully allowed
to progress without public notification in very narrow circumstances. This process
is called non-notification. Generally, the proposal must have less than minor
effects on the environment or all those persons who may be potentially affected
have given their consent.
Over 95% of resource consents are processed non-notified.
Controversial development proposals including the construction of large towers
in residential areas, major wetland draining and native forest logging have all
been processed without public notification.
There is no Environment Court
appeal right on notification. Instead people have to seek a High Court judicial
review of the process the council used.
There is currently a proposal in
the Resource Management and Electricity Legislation Amendment Bill to introduce
Environment Court rights to seek declarations as to whether or not a resource
consent application should have been notified (a form of notification appeal).
|