Home | Contact | Join | Search 

 Membership  |  Conservation  |  Media  |  Support  |  Publications  |  Branches  |  Enjoying Nature  |  Children  |  About Us


Media Releases

2008 Index

2007 Index

2006 Index

2005 Index

2004 Index

2003 Index

2002 Index

2001 Index

2000 Index

1999 Index

1998 Index

1997 Index

 

Supreme Court decision victory for public participation

19 April 2005 - Wellington

Contact: Kevin Hackwell, Conservation Manager, 04 801 2215 (w), 04 389 4815 (h), 021 227 8420

The Supreme Court today released a decision on public notification under the Resource Management Act that reinforces the need for Environment Court appeal rights.

The Supreme Court has held, in a unanimous decision, that a resource consent allowing the operation of a discount outlet shopping centre by Discount Brands Ltd in Akoranga Drive, Northcote is invalid because Discount Brands' application for the consent was not publicly notified.

"This case is a symptom of a wider problem. Central Government and local authorities are bending over backwards to accommodate business-led opposition to the Resource Management Act. As a result the law is being abused," said Conservation Manager Kevin Hackwell.

"This decision shows why Environment Court appeal rights on public notification are needed. Currently people can only go to the High Court, and then the Supreme Court to ensure that their rights are upheld. This is very expensive," he said.

"This case was between trade competitors. They are the only ones who can afford the legal costs involved," he said.

"A low-cost appeal right on notification would soon sort out those councils that deny people their legitimate, lawful right to have their say on developments that will affect them and their environment," he said.

NOTES

Development proposals are only lawfully allowed to progress without public notification in very narrow circumstances. This process is called non-notification. Generally, the proposal must have less than minor effects on the environment or all those persons who may be potentially affected have given their consent.

Over 95% of resource consents are processed non-notified. Controversial development proposals including the construction of large towers in residential areas, major wetland draining and native forest logging have all been processed without public notification.

There is no Environment Court appeal right on notification. Instead people have to seek a High Court judicial review of the process the council used.

There is currently a proposal in the Resource Management and Electricity Legislation Amendment Bill to introduce Environment Court rights to seek declarations as to whether or not a resource consent application should have been notified (a form of notification appeal).